The documentation of PeekLock and ReceiveAndDelete indicate that ReceiveAndDelete should have higher throughput because it does the receiving and deleting in 1 call instead of locking and deleting in 2 calls. However, when I use Service Bus Explorer to
measure the throughput of my local Service Bus for Windows Server instance, I see that the throughput of PeekLock is double the throughput of ReceiveAndDelete. Why am I seeing this behavior?
↧
